Mapping Constitutionally Safeguarded Judicial Independence — A Global Survey
نویسندگان
چکیده
De jure judicial independence (JI) is the single most important predictor of de facto JI. In this paper, we describe under what conditions countries are likely to include JI in their constitutions. We and analyze both original choice regard as well change over time using a newly constructed dataset comprised 100 covering years between 1950 2005. Three results stand out. First, legal origins do have an impact on likelihood explicitly anchoring constitution: belonging common law tradition less implement constitutions (and those with socialist more so). Correspondingly, former British colonies address states Caribbean. Second, religion has significant whether included societies experiencing high level religious fractionalization not only anchor constitutions, but also that direction later on. Finally, Muslim mention JI, whereas Protestant so. Third, distribution resources within important—and largely unexpected—effects: higher percentage family farms, wider education, urban dwellers all connected lower being mentioned constitution.
منابع مشابه
A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948–2012
We present a new cross-national measure of de facto judicial independence, which is available for 200 countries from 1948 to 2012. To do so, we introduce a statistical measurement model for uncovering latent concepts commonly encountered in time-series, cross-sectional analyses in comparative politics and international relations. Our approach addresses unique challenges that arise in these data...
متن کاملJudicial Independence in Europe
• Understanding to what extent judicial independence is adhered to in various jurisdictions requires a theoretical framework of what the principle entails. On a preliminary analysis, the principle can be said to require the following: judicial systems must be free, in fact and appearance, from any undue influence that might prevent judges from adjudicating legal disputes solely on the basis of ...
متن کاملJudiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence
Judicial independence is an idea that has both internal (or normative) and external (or institutional) aspects. From a normative viewpoint, judges should be autonomous moral agents, who can be relied on to carry out their public duties independent of venal or ideological considerations. Independence, or impartiality, in this sense is a desirable aspect of a judge’s character. But judges are hum...
متن کاملDoes De Jure Judicial Independence Really Matter?: A Reevaluation of Explanations for Judicial Independence
The relationship between de jure and de facto judicial independence is much debated in the literature. Some studies find no relationship between the formal rules governing the structure of the judiciary and its de facto independence. Other studies find a significant correlation between de jure and de facto judicial independence, with one study even touting de jure judicial independence as the m...
متن کاملJudicial Independence and Retention Elections *
Judges face retention elections in over a third of U.S. state courts of last resort and numerous lower courts. According to conventional wisdom, these elections engender judicial independence and decrease democratic accountability. We argue that in the context of modern judicial campaigns, retention elections create pressure for judges to cater to public opinion on “hot-button” issues that are ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Science Research Network
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1556-5068']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4372536